Home News Politics I Am Not From Nigeria: Nnamdi Kanu

I Am Not From Nigeria: Nnamdi Kanu

16
0

The leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, yesterday shocked many when he said that he is not a Nigerian citizen. Nnamdi Kanu Disclosed this on ‘Radio Biafra.

Kanu opined that he would challenge the court order directing his arrest in the UK. Recall that a federal high court in Abuja on Friday revoked his bail for his continued absence in court. The same court also issued an arrest warrant against the IPOB leader.

 Nnamdi kanu reacting to his arrest warrant, according to The cable, averred, “The revocation of my bail will never ever hold; they can never convict us because we have done nothing wrong,” he said. “Every move they make, every decision they take, I will challenge. I have instructed my lawyers; we will challenge in a competent court of law here in Britain where law actually works. I am waiting for them.

 IPOB replies Anthony Nwoko who accused Nnamdi Kanu, of collecting money from APC govt “Any day you instruct INTERPOL, that day I will take it up in court and they must answer because here is a civilized country. “First, I am not a Nigerian citizen. Your bail revocation will never ever work. Anybody interested in revoking my bail would have asked the army what they were doing in my place.”


SPECIAL Counsel to Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, Mr. Aloy Ejimakor, has faulted reports that Kanu’s sureties applied to the court to withdraw their suretyship. Senator Enyinnaya Abaribe is one the sureties that the Abuja High Court asked to produce the IPOB following his disappearance in 2017 after security agents attacked his Umuahia, Abia State country home. Fani-Kayode, Kanu and Abaribe, In a statement said: “On the matter of revocation of Kanu’s bail and the consequent Order of bench warrant, I, Barrister Aloy Ejimakor, of Counsel to one of the sureties and a Special Counsel to Nnamdi Kanu, hereby issue the following statement: “The reports in the media quoting Justice Binta Murtala-Nyako as stating (when revoking Nnamdi Kanu’s bail on March 28, 2019) that the ‘three sureties who bailed Kanu had applied to the court to SPECIAL Counsel to Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, , that the ‘three sureties who bailed Kanu had applied to the court to withdraw their suretyship’ is inaccurate “I should know because I represent one of the sureties and we never made such application, or anything close to it. “On the contrary, the sureties have been fighting to stay on as sureties while pointing to the army invasion of Kanu’s home as the sole and proximate reason for their inability to produce Kanu in Court. That argument is still pending a hearing in a suretyship proceeding that was adjourned sine die at the time of the entry of the Order of bail revocation and the ensuing bench warrant. “For the foregoing reasons, we are currently studying the record of proceedings of the said March 28 hearing to see whether it will be necessary for the sureties to file fresh processes to protect the integrity of their suretyship relationship with Nnamdi Kanu, which is still valid and subsisting.”


LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here